P3 Summary: Prompt → Program → Proof
Prompt & Question
Prompt: Create a concise, self-contained brief of Introduction to Logic (3e) for readers in CS and math, highlighting the book’s distinctive pedagogy and resources.
Question: What makes this edition different (content and form), what topics are covered, and how do the online tools integrate with the text?
Data (Sources)
- SpringerLink product page with description, ToC, ISBNs, and dates.[1]
- Stanford online companion (chapters, lessons, exercises, tools, videos).[2], [3], [4]
- Background on Herbrand vs. Tarskian semantics.[5], [6]
Logic (How we evaluate)
- Use the publisher page for bibliographic facts, topic coverage, and claims about pedagogy.
- Use the Stanford site to support statements about exercises/videos/tools.
- Use neutral references for short glossary notes on semantics.
Program (Driver)
A tiny “check” harness ensures every data-claim element has at least one citation in Citations.
// Pseudocode
const claims=[...document.querySelectorAll('[data-claim]')];
for (const c of claims) assert(c.querySelector('sup a[href^="#fn-"]'));
Proof = Reason Why + Check. “Reason Why” summarizes evidence; “Check” verifies structure.
Answer (TL;DR)
Genesereth & Kao’s third edition teaches modern formal logic for computer science with a distinctive Herbrand-first approach (rather than starting with standard Tarskian semantics), tightly integrated with online chapters, exercises, tools, and videos hosted by Stanford.[1], [2]
Reason Why (Evidence)
The publisher page explicitly notes the Herbrand-first pedagogy and the availability of online exercises, tools, videos, and forum, and provides a detailed table of contents.
[1]
The Stanford companion site lists lessons, chapters, and practice exercises that align with the book’s structure (e.g., propositional logic, relational logic, Herbrand logic, induction, resolution).[3], [4]
Check (Self-test)
Automated checks verify: (1) every claim has a citation; (2) required sections exist; (3) core metadata parses.
Running checks…
Logic Track: What the Book Covers & Why It’s Different
- Scope and order. Topics include propositional logic and proofs, relational logic and analysis, Herbrand logic and proofs, induction, and resolution — with a sequence visible in the ToC.[1]
- Herbrand-first pedagogy. The text begins with Herbrand semantics to simplify early reasoning and connect to computation, instead of introducing truth in arbitrary structures first.[1]
- Online ecosystem. Exercises with auto-grading, interactive tools, and videos are available on the Stanford site, designed to be used alongside the text.[1], [2], [3]
- CS orientation. The series (Synthesis Lectures on Computer Science) frames logic for applications in computing while retaining mathematical rigor.[1]
- Semantics context. “Herbrand vs. Tarski” is a genuine contrast: Herbrand uses term-based structures; Tarski is the standard set-theoretic semantics of first-order logic.[5], [6]
Takeaway: Start with computable, ground-term semantics to build intuition and tooling; then connect to classical semantics and proof systems.
Themes
- Computation-friendly logic. Emphasis on models and methods that mirror automated reasoning workflows.[1]
- Blended learning. Textbook plus online chapters, exercises, and videos to reinforce practice.[2], [3]
- Bridging semantics and proof. The Herbrand-first route connects semantics to proof search and resolution earlier than traditional courses.[1]
Studies & Context
- Publisher details. Edition number, ISBNs (softcover and eBook), dates, and series information are listed on SpringerLink.[1]
- Companion site. Lessons, chapters, and exercises illustrate the integrated learning model.[2], [3], [4]
Glossary (quick reference)
- Herbrand semantics
- Term-based semantics: the universe is built from ground terms; models assign truth values to ground atoms (Herbrand structures/models).[5]
- Tarskian (standard) semantics
- Classical set-theoretic semantics for first-order logic, used to define truth in an arbitrary structure.[6]
- Resolution
- A refutation-complete proof method for clauses; covered after induction in the book’s sequence.[1]